Does a drone need FCC authorization?

It depends on where it is made. Since December 22, 2025, drones and their critical parts produced in a foreign country are on the FCC Covered List as a class: a new model cannot receive an FCC authorization at all, whatever the brand, unless the Department of War or Homeland Security grants a Conditional Approval. Items on the Blue UAS Cleared List, and components that qualify as domestic end products, are excepted until January 1, 2027. Models authorized before the listing, and drones made in the United States, follow the usual composite paths: Certification for the radio link, SDoC or Certification for the digital part.

The drone class question in the check decides this: a drone or critical part made outside the United States cannot be authorized as a new model; otherwise its radio link is an intentional radiator Certified with an FCC ID.

FCC equipment authorization

Both paths (a composite device)

The product both transmits and contains digital electronics, so it spans two roles. The transmitter part follows one path and the digital part follows another; each is resolved below.

The transmitter part
Certification (through a TCB)

A device that deliberately transmits radio energy is an intentional radiator, and the default path is Certification: a Telecommunication Certification Body reviews the test data and issues a grant of equipment authorization with an FCC ID before the product is marketed.

  • A narrow set of low-power intentional radiators (carrier current systems and devices under 47 CFR 15.211, 15.213, 15.221, and certain sub-490 kHz devices) use SDoC instead of Certification under 47 CFR 15.201(a). Confirm the specific device.
The digital electronics part
SDoC or Certification (the party's choice)

Digital electronics that are not meant to radiate are an unintentional radiator, and for almost every such device the party chooses between a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity (self-declared against the standards) and Certification.

  • For the SDoC path the responsible party must be located in the United States (47 CFR 2.909). An importer acting as the responsible party takes on that role.
  • The testing behind an SDoC cannot be done at a lab owned or controlled by a prohibited entity (47 CFR 2.906(a)(1)). 47 CFR 2.902 defines those as companies on the FCC Covered List, the Commerce Entity List or Military End-User List, the UFLPA Entity List, and others.
  • Any SDoC device may instead be Certified at the party's option (47 CFR 2.906(c)); SDoC is not the only path.
  • Routers and drones produced outside the United States are on the FCC Covered List as whole product classes (routers since March 23, 2026; drones and their critical components since December 22, 2025). A new model of either cannot be authorized at all, whatever the brand. The check asks which, if either, applies to the specific product.
  • From October 13, 2026 a device that contains a logic-bearing hardware component, such as a chip or module, made by a company named on the FCC Covered List cannot be authorized either (91 FR 57798). The same rule requires online marketplaces to show a certified device's FCC ID at the point of sale, from March 1, 2027 for marketplaces that stock or take title to the device and June 1, 2027 for the rest.
  • This identifies the authorization path and cites the rule. It does not perform or certify testing and does not issue the authorization. A specialized FCC test lab or a Telecommunication Certification Body does that.
Next step

The factory holds the evidence this path relies on. The Supplier Data Request Pack asks a factory for it in the factory's own language: the FCC ID for a Certified transmitter, or the test report and measurement data for SDoC electronics.

Open the Supplier Data Request Pack
Sources
47 CFR § 15.201

Equipment authorization requirement: '…all intentional radiators operating under the provisions of this part shall be certified by the Telecommunication Certification Bodies…prior to marketing' (b), except the carve-out in (a): carrier current systems, devices operated under §§15.211, 15.213 and 15.221, and devices operating below 490 kHz whose emissions are at least 40 dB below the §15.209 limits are 'subject to Suppliers Declaration of Conformity…prior to marketing.'

eCFR current text, title 47, as of the 2026-09-22 issue date (read via the eCFR versioner API). Retrieved 2026-09-24.

47 CFR § 2.907

Certification is an equipment authorization approved by the Commission or issued by a Telecommunication Certification Body (TCB) based on representations and test data submitted by the applicant; it attaches to all subsequently marketed units identical to the sample tested.

eCFR current text, title 47, as of the 2026-09-22 issue date (read via the eCFR versioner API). Retrieved 2026-09-24.

47 CFR § 15.101

Equipment authorization of unintentional radiators: except as exempted in §§15.23, 15.103, 15.113, unintentional radiators shall be authorized pursuant to certification or Supplier's Declaration of Conformity per subpart J of part 2. Table 1 lists 'SDoC or Certification' for almost every device type; Scanning Receivers, Radar Detectors, and Access Broadband over Power Line (Access BPL) are 'Certification'.

eCFR current text, title 47, as of the 2026-09-22 issue date (read via the eCFR versioner API). Retrieved 2026-09-24.

47 CFR § 2.906

Supplier's Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) is a procedure where the responsible party (§2.909) makes measurements or completes procedures to ensure compliance. (a)(1): the testing 'must not be performed at a measurement facility that is owned by, controlled by, or under the direction of a prohibited entity, as defined in § 2.902' (which lists Covered List entities, the BIS Entity List and Military End-User List, and the UFLPA Entity List, among others). (a)(2): submittal of a sample or data is not required unless requested (§2.945). Under (c) the responsible party may, if it desires, apply for Certification of a device subject to SDoC. Under (d) equipment produced by any entity on the Covered List is prohibited from the SDoC process and must use certification.

eCFR current text, title 47, as of the 2026-09-22 issue date (read via the eCFR versioner API). Retrieved 2026-09-24.

47 CFR § 2.909

Responsible party: for equipment subject to Supplier's Declaration of Conformity the party responsible for compliance 'must be located in the United States (see §2.1077)' — the manufacturer or assembler, or the importer if imported. For a grant of certification, the grantee is responsible.

eCFR current text, title 47, as of the 2026-09-22 issue date (read via the eCFR versioner API). Retrieved 2026-09-24.

91 FR 57798: logic-bearing components and marketplace FCC-ID display (effective 2026-10-13)

The Commission 'prohibits authorization of devices that incorporate a logic-bearing hardware component produced by an entity identified on the Covered List, where the device would itself be prohibited from authorization under 47 CFR 2.903(a) had the Covered List entity produced the device as a whole'. The prohibition 'applies only to logic-bearing hardware components produced by entities subject to producer/provider-based Covered List determinations; it does not apply to production location-based Covered List entries (e.g., UAS, UAS critical components, or routers produced in a foreign country) unless the producing entity is independently identified on the Covered List', applies prospectively to new applications and 'does not affect previously authorized equipment'. Amended § 2.803(c): an online marketplace that markets a device subject to certification, or has physical access to or takes title to a third-party seller's device, 'must display a valid and accurate FCC ID ... at the online point of sale' (compliance not required until March 1, 2027); a marketplace without physical access or title must display a valid FCC ID (June 1, 2027). Used and pre-existing unamended listings and non-high-volume sellers are excluded.

91 FR 57798 (2026-09-11), FCC 26-50, Third Report and Order in ET Docket 21-232; effective 2026-10-13. Retrieved 2026-09-24.

This page classifies a drone from its typical design. To check a specific product, including a variant that adds a radio, run the free FCC Requirement Check.

Run the free FCC check
Legal Disclaimer

This report is an automated, informational screening tool only. Tiana & Co. is not a licensed customs broker and does not conduct customs business. This report does not constitute legal advice, a compliance determination, or a certification of admissibility for any supplier, product, or shipment.

Verdicts in this report are produced by deterministic code, not by a language model. The explanatory paragraph accompanying each check is model-generated and checked against the cited sources before delivery. No part of this report is reviewed by a person before it is issued, so every material finding and citation should be confirmed against the underlying government source before it is relied on.

This report reflects data available as of the report date. The OFAC SDN and Consolidated lists, the other U.S. Consolidated Screening List constituents, the UFLPA Entity List, CBP withhold release orders, CPSC's eFiling list, and regulatory guidance are updated frequently and without prior notice. Users should re-screen periodically and consult qualified counsel for compliance decisions.

Name-similarity results do not establish or rule out the identity of any company. Where multiple similarly named records exist, none should be treated as confirmed without independent verification against the primary government source.

This tool is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or a substitute for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, or any other government agency. No warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness, or currency of any finding.

Use of this report for import, procurement, sanctions-compliance, or investment decisions is at the user's own risk. Anyone with compliance obligations under UFLPA, OFAC, or CPSC regulations should consult qualified legal counsel before making a transactional decision.