Does a USB keyboard need FCC certification?

A wired USB keyboard does not transmit radio signals, so it is an unintentional radiator. The responsible party chooses between SDoC (self-declared) and Certification. There is no FCC ID.

A wired keyboard has a microcontroller but no transmitter, which is the textbook unintentional radiator. (A Bluetooth keyboard would add the Certification path.)

FCC equipment authorization

SDoC or Certification (the party's choice)

Digital electronics that are not meant to radiate are an unintentional radiator, and for almost every such device the party chooses between a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity (self-declared against the standards) and Certification.

  • For the SDoC path the responsible party must be located in the United States (47 CFR 2.909). An importer acting as the responsible party takes on that role.
  • Any SDoC device may instead be Certified at the party's option (47 CFR 2.906(c)); SDoC is not the only path.
  • This identifies the authorization path and cites the rule. It does not perform or certify testing and does not issue the authorization. A specialized FCC test lab or a Telecommunication Certification Body does that.
Next step

The factory holds the evidence this path relies on. The Supplier Data Request Pack asks a factory for it in the factory's own language: the FCC ID for a Certified transmitter, or the test report and measurement data for SDoC electronics.

Open the Supplier Data Request Pack
Sources
47 CFR § 15.101

Equipment authorization of unintentional radiators: except as exempted in §§15.23, 15.103, 15.113, unintentional radiators shall be authorized pursuant to certification or Supplier's Declaration of Conformity per subpart J of part 2. Table 1 lists 'SDoC or Certification' for almost every device type; Scanning Receivers, Radar Detectors, and Access Broadband over Power Line (Access BPL) are 'Certification'.

CFR 2024 annual edition, title 47 vol. 1 (GPO/govinfo). Retrieved 2026-08-26.

47 CFR § 2.906

Supplier's Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) is a procedure where the responsible party (§2.909) makes measurements or completes procedures to ensure compliance; submittal of a sample or data is not required unless requested (§2.945). Under (c) the responsible party may, if it desires, apply for Certification of a device subject to SDoC. Under (d) Covered List producers must use certification.

CFR 2024 annual edition, title 47 vol. 1 (GPO/govinfo). Retrieved 2026-08-26.

47 CFR § 2.909

Responsible party: for equipment subject to Supplier's Declaration of Conformity the party responsible for compliance 'must be located in the United States (see §2.1077)' — the manufacturer or assembler, or the importer if imported. For a grant of certification, the grantee is responsible.

CFR 2024 annual edition, title 47 vol. 1 (GPO/govinfo). Retrieved 2026-08-26.

This page classifies a wired USB keyboard from its typical design. To check a specific product, including a variant that adds a radio, run the free FCC Requirement Check.

Run the free FCC check
Legal Disclaimer

This report is an automated, informational screening tool only. Tiana & Co. is not a licensed customs broker and does not conduct customs business. This report does not constitute legal advice, a compliance determination, or a certification of admissibility for any supplier, product, or shipment.

Verdicts in this report are produced by deterministic code, not by a language model. The explanatory paragraph accompanying each check is model-generated and checked against the cited sources before delivery. No part of this report is reviewed by a person before it is issued, so every material finding and citation should be confirmed against the underlying government source before it is relied on.

This report reflects data available as of the report date. The OFAC SDN and Consolidated lists, the other U.S. Consolidated Screening List constituents, the UFLPA Entity List, CBP withhold release orders, CPSC's eFiling list, and regulatory guidance are updated frequently and without prior notice. Users should re-screen periodically and consult qualified counsel for compliance decisions.

Name-similarity results do not establish or rule out the identity of any company. Where multiple similarly named records exist, none should be treated as confirmed without independent verification against the primary government source.

This tool is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or a substitute for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, or any other government agency. No warranty is made as to the accuracy, completeness, or currency of any finding.

Use of this report for import, procurement, sanctions-compliance, or investment decisions is at the user's own risk. Anyone with compliance obligations under UFLPA, OFAC, or CPSC regulations should consult qualified legal counsel before making a transactional decision.